Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Rugby Update


For the first time in three years I am playing rugby competitively. I played throughout high school and in my senior year ended up captaining the squad, although that was probably due to the overall inexperience of the rest of the players, and probably not due to my leadership or rugby skills.

A quick rugby explanation for all my reader. Rugby consists of 15 players per side - 7 backs and 8 forwards.

The backs are usually assigned as follows:

Back 3 - Right Wing, Left Wing, Fullback: Usually the fastest players on the side, responsible for returning kicks and known for finishing tries.

Centers - Inside Center and Outside Center: Big, hard runners who can make a pass, run straight and hard, and tackle well. The inside center is similar to a full back in Football and the outside center is more like a tail back.

Fly Half - Quarterback of the team: he decides which plays to run and who should get the ball. He is also usually the best passer (along with the Scrum Half) and best kicker on the team.

Scrum Half - Usually the smallest, scrappiest player on the team. He is a very strong passer and is the link between the forwards and the backs.

The forwards are assigned as follows:

Front row - Loosehead and Tighthead Props, Hooker: These guys are the first row in the scrum. The hooker is the person who hooks the ball back into his side with his foot when the ball is tossed in to the scrum. The props are usually the biggest guys on the team and are used for their crashing and mass (Lineman in football)

Second Row - Locks: These players are strong tacklers and runners and usually the tallest two fellows on the pitch. They are the ones that are hoisted into the air during lineouts.

Flankers: The best tacklers on the team - think of them as line backers in football.

8: The back of the scrum. He controls the ball with his foot and must be able to run like a back but hit like a forward. One of the busier players during the game.

/* Start boring stuff about me - skip if you don't have time */


Alright, in my early high school rugby days I played on the wing which tends to be where many teams put new players to learn the game. You don't get very much action out there but it is a critical position if the team can move the ball around. Later that year and for the next couple years I played in the centers and enjoyed that position immensely as you get a lot of passes but you tend to get hit really hard really often. In my final year I played Fly Half which was a lot of pressure but a lot of fun. Our team really sucked that year so there wasn't that much pressure. This year I'm playing out on the wing again mainly, but I've played a couple of games at fullback as well. This league offers a much more competitive game than what I played in high school, mainly made up of university players and wiley veterans.

I've played about 7 games with the club and we aren't doing very well (2-5) but we are starting to come together as a team. The club has 4 teams - Waterloo County 1, Waterloo County 2, Cambridge Pirates, Kitchener Knaves. We all practice together, but are in different leagues. WC1 and WC2 are in the Ontario Rugby Union Keenan I and II leagues respectively (one and two leagues beneath the Ontario premiership). Cambridge and Kitchener play in Niagara Rugby Union A and B respectively which are competitive leagues but not as tough as the ORU league. I play for the Pirates and absolutely love the group of guys we play with. Good attitudes, tough players, and they love to party after the games. The reason we aren't doing so well is because the other teams in the NRU A put their first team out every week. We tend to get the second and third string players from the club since the first string players and lots of second string players all play for Waterloo County. However, another year as a group and we'll be much more competitive.
/* End boring stuff about me */


There are so many reasons I'm attracted to this game:

1. You get to do everything! Play smashmouth and knock some lights out or play with finesse and precision. Every player on the pitch gets to tackle, kick, pass, and run. In football you have one job and you probably don't get involved in most of the game play.

2. You can play as long as you are able. Similar to hockey, soccer, and slo-pitch, there are plenty of men's leagues around the country and there is no age limit. Many places also have old-timers leagues that you can play in if you're over 40.

3. Sportsmanship. You pound some guy's face into the mud all game and then he buys you a beer after the match. The so-called "third half" is the beer up that always takes place after the match and it is mandatory. Lots of chugging competitions and sing-a-longs.

4. Culture. Due to its origins in England, the rugby culture feels very British. And its a nice change of pace. The field is called the pitch, your cleats are called boots, your uniform is called your kit, out of bounds is called "into touch", a game is called a match, speed is called pace, and so on.

5. Fitness. Rugby is more running than any other sport I can think of. It's very sprint/stop with a lot of physical contact which keeps its players in really good cardiovascular shape as well as keeping overall strength and speed up.

Anyways, we have about 3 more matches left this season and then I can finally heal for a while. Anyways, hopefully that is the last self indulgent post that comes up here. More insight next time.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

iPhone Madness.


Wow it's been a while. I don't have any excuses, other than the fact that I basically haven't had anything to do this summer and now that I do (PDEng assignment), might as well write a blog entry.

Today I had the opportunity to play with a real, live iPhone and I have to say I was pretty impressed. Like any other gadget-blog reader, I've been completely overwhelmed by the iPhone news over the past month and had to start filtering out any post about the iPhone because it was getting so annoying. I don't think there's ever been this much hype about a gadget, although any news coming out of the cult-like Mac community tends to hog the newswire around release time. Despite my frustration with all the iPhone coverage, I was still pretty excited to play with one.

First impressions - sexy. Apple is known for having incredible industrial design and they have produced some of the sexiest technology out there - from the iPod to their operating system Mac OS X. I am a huge fan of minimalism and thankfully, so is Steve Jobs. The iPod managed to succeed with only 5 buttons and revolutionized the mp3 market. The iPhone has one button - home. Everything else is accessed via its glass touch screen. The touch screen has a very good resolution (both optical and capacitive) and although smudges are awfully annoying, the glass is much more scratch-resistant than typical plastic LCD covers.

Navigation is fairly intuitive with lots of flicking, pinching, and tapping. However, exiting programs was not very simple and I usually just hit the physical home button to return to the homescreen. It supported a bumch of email programs such as GMail Yahoo! etc and it was a breeze to configure my gmail account and read mail. Replying to mail was simply impossible - the iPhone keypad is as bad as the reviews say. It is simply unusable. It would be convenient if the keyboard would flip horizontal when you flip the device horizontal (as all images and web pages do) since this would make the keys a bit larger and perhaps increase the accuracy. As a BlackBerry user, I found thumb-typing on a touchscreen with no tactile feedback nearly impossible. I was typing approximately 6 words per minute.

The reason I was impressed with the iPhone was its media playback. Looking at the photos on the phone was a very enjoyable experience. You can easily zoom in/out, flick around, start slideshows, and view in portrait or landscape view simply by tilting the device (complete with pretty animations). The iPod portion of the phone was really cool as well - cover flow is just as cool as the commercial, and scrolling through songs/artists/albums flows really well. I thought there would be a character-based search option but I couldn't find it. This would really make the iPod for me. Another downside is that the headphone jack is the standard 3.5 mm but they sunk it into the plastic so that only their earbuds will fit in it (my sennheisers won't work without an adapter).

Overall, the applications all look cool, and navigating around was really cool. As a phone or smartphone, I would never buy one of these. The crappy keyboard, ridiculous AT&T contract lock-in, and lack of GPS are all dealbreakers for me. However, if Apple uses all the technology in their next video iPod, I would definitely buy one. Especially if they can mimic their 9 hours of battery life during video playback (as reported by the engadget iPhone review). Verdict: wait for the next iPod and buy a BlackBerry ;)

Anyways, I'll be trying to update this bad boy once a week from here on out. Thanks for reading.